Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Frances Denney, et al v. Amphenol Corp., et al
as 23-8022
Petitioner:
FRANCES DENNEY and ARTHUR TERHUNE
Respondent:
AMPHENOL CORP., HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., BORGWARNER, INC. and others
TERHUNE et al v. PITT et al
as 3:2022cv00177
Plaintiff:
GERALD TERHUNE and THERESA SPERRY
Defendant:
NATHAN PITT, JACQUELINE A. DUFF, CORY OFFERMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FINANCIAL PACIFIC LEASING, INC. v. ALL AROUND CONCRETE, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00643
Defendant:
Conrad Edward III Terhune, All Around Concrete, LLC, Edward Terhune and others
Plaintiff:
Financial Pacific Leasing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Terhune v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv01064
Plaintiff:
Dorothea Terhune
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
CSS-Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
TERHUNE v. USA
as 1:2020cv00348
Petitioner:
BRIAN L. TERHUNE
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
DENNEY et al v. AMPHENOL CORP. et al
as 1:2019cv04757
Defendant:
BORGWARNER PDS (PERU) f/k/a FRANKLIN POWER PRODUCTS, INC., AMPHENOL CORP., 400 FORSYTHE, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR TERHUNE and FRANCES DENNEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03642
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01440
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Terhune v. Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00561
Plaintiff:
Brian Terhune
Defendant:
Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Auxilium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-3775
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
