Cases 1 - 10 of 7,578
Solis v. Yazoo City USP et al
as 1:2024cv04905
Petitioner:
Leonel Solis
Respondent:
Yazoo City USP and FCI Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
ECKELBARGER v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv01002
Petitioner:
TREVOR L. ECKELBARGER
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown, Curtis v. Kraus et al
as 3:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
Curtis V. Brown
Defendant:
CO Kraus, Warden Buesgen and John Doe 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shannon Agofsky v. BOP, et al
as 24-2007
Plaintiff:
SHANNON WAYNE AGOFSKY
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, COLETTE S. PETERS, ANDRE MATEVOUSIAN and others
Micheal Attaway v. Darren Galloway, et al
as 24-1985
Plaintiff:
MICHEAL N.B. ATTAWAY
Defendant:
DARREN GALLOWAY, Warden, Prison Warden, Shawnee CC, AMANDA SMITH, Mental Health Director, Shawnee CC, LATOYA HUGHES, Director, IDOC and others
Justise v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00477
Petitioner:
Charles E Justise, Sr
Respondent:
Warden
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Huaco v. Lammer
as 3:2024cv50225
Petitioner:
Alberto Canales Huaco
Respondent:
Warden Brian Lammer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Fields v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00479
Petitioner:
Leonidas Roy Fields
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Kevin Bure v. C. Gann, et al
as 24-1990
Plaintiff:
KEVIN J. BURE
Defendant:
C. GANN, ERIN WILLIAMS, JASON SMILEY, Warden and others
Simmons, Arthur v. Gunderson Health System et al
as 3:2024cv00383
Plaintiff:
Jr. Arthur Gene Simmons
Defendant:
Gunderson Health System, Gunderson Eye Clinic - Black River Falls, Warden Buesgen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
