Cases 1 - 10 of 108
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00827
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
McGee et al v. Schindler et al
as 2:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Tawana Ann McGee and Timothy D'Angelo Mickell
Defendant:
Stephen Schindler, Benjamin Lopez and Mitchell Tipton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TIPTON v. RULE
as 2:2023cv00550
Petitioner:
WARREN RAY TIPTON
Respondent:
T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Tipton v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2023pq03753
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Ronald Tipton
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rodriguez v. Tipton
as 1:2023cv15349
Plaintiff:
Rosalia Rodriguez
Defendant:
Matthew J. Tipton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Nandlal v. Tipton et al
as 2:2023cv00308
Plaintiff:
Brandi Nandlal
Defendant:
MD Matthew Tipton, Keith Ramsey, Maya Dominique and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Medical Malpractice
Tipton v. L'Oreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv09746
Plaintiff:
Monica Tipton
Defendant:
L'Oreal USA, Inc., L'Oreal USA Products, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson LLC, and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
TIPTON v. TUNNER
as 1:2023cv01011
Petitioner:
MEGAN TIPTON
Respondent:
LASHELL TUNNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00977
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
BOYD v. CUMMINGS et al
as 1:2023cv00494
Plaintiff:
DEREK BOYD
Defendant:
RODNEY CUMMINGS, COURTNEY STATON, MADISON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISIONER'S and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
