Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02767
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02645
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Jerry Johnson v. Gary Feinerman
as 19-2180
Interested Party:
THOMAS J. DART, STEVE JAROSZ, Officer, Officer, Star # 6803, a city employee, KIMBERLY M. FOXX and others
Respondent:
GARY FEINERMAN, United States District Court Judge
Petitioner:
JERRY V. JOHNSON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02628
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Jerry Johnson v. City of Chicago
as 17-3262
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERRY V. JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO, a municipal corporation
Futch v. Powell et al
as 3:2017cv00754
Plaintiff:
Kenny L Futch
Defendant:
M Powell, C Stobaugh, V Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jerry Johnson v. Gary Feinerman
as 17-3026
Petitioner:
JERRY V. JOHNSON
Respondent:
GARY FEINERMAN, United States District Court Judge
Party-in-Interest:
CITY OF CHICAGO, A municipal corporation and STEVE JAROSZ, Officer, Officer, Star # 6803, a city employee
CLARK et al v. COOK GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv06069
Plaintiff:
ALMA DELIA AGUILAR, LINDA ALLEN, ANTHONY ATKINS and others
Defendant:
COOK GROUP INC., COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Jerry Johnson v. City of Chicago, et al
as 16-3657
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERRY V. JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO, A Municipal Corporation and STEVE JAROSZ, Officer, Officer, Star #6803, a City Employee
Jerry Johnson v. City of Chicago, et al
as 16-3521
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERRY V. JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO, a municipal corporation and STEVE JAROSZ, Officer, Star #6803, a City employee
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
