Cases 1 - 10 of 1,440
Nguyen v. Madsen et al
as 1:2024cv04794
Plaintiff:
Van Toan Nguyen
Defendant:
Director at USCIS Kenneth Madsen, Director at USCIS Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Administrative Procedure Act
Jason Arnold v. Kevin Gillis, et al
as 24-1964
Plaintiff:
JASON P. ARNOLD
Defendant:
KEVIN GILLIS, JOSH CHRISTMAN, WILLIAM FISHER and others
Banks v. Smith et al
as 3:2024cv01433
Plaintiff:
Edward A. Banks
Defendant:
M. Smith, Duffy, Ford Transit Van Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Logan v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv03897
Plaintiff:
Leonard Logan
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Glenn Evans, Alejandro Almazan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Forester-Hoare v. Freeman et al
as 2:2024cv00557
Plaintiff:
Sean Forester-Hoare
Defendant:
Dr Freeman, Dr Lavoie, Baier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Van De Werken v. Volkan Signs and Lighting Inc.
as 1:2024cv03487
Plaintiff:
Henry Van De Werken and Volkan Signs and Lighting Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Siegmann v. Frohling et al
as 2:2024cv00443
Plaintiff:
Daniel Leonard Siegmann
Defendant:
David W Frohling and Danielle J Van Egtern
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stephen Lush v. Gregory Van Rybroek
as 24-1552
Petitioner:
STEPHEN LUSH
Respondent:
GREG VAN RYBROEK, Director, Mendota Mental Health Institute
Lush, Stephen v. Van Rybroek, Gregory
as 3:2024cv00243
Petitioner:
Stephen Lush
Respondent:
Gregory Van Rybroek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
