Cases 1 - 10 of 7,772
Rosenbaum v. United States of America Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2024cv01339
Respondent:
United States of America Federal Bureau of Prisons and Warden of FPC Pekin
Petitioner:
Aimee Lynn Rosenbaum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lyons v. United States of America Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2024cv01336
Defendant:
Warden of FPC Pekin, Danielle Smith, Carrie Schmidt and others
Plaintiff:
LaShana Lyons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Olinger v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2024cv01337
Defendant:
Danielle Smith, Warden of FPC Pekin, United States of America and others
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth E Olinger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ramon Alvarado, Jr. v. Brian Foster, et al
as 24-2257
Defendant:
BRAD HOMPE, BRIAN FOSTER, Warden, JAMES MUENCHOW and others
Plaintiff:
RAMON ALVARADO, JR.
Morgan v. Warden, USP Thomson
as 3:2024cv50382
Petitioner:
Jack William Morgan
Respondent:
Warden, USP Thomson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
WELCHES v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv01634
Petitioner:
KENNETH ALLEN WELCHES
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smiley v Phillip et al
as 2:2024cv01192
Defendant:
Julie Ludwig, Dr Phillip Wheatley, Hormes Michelle and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Smiley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKinney v. Warden, FCI Pekin
as 1:2024cv01328
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Pekin
Petitioner:
James McKinney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hawkins v. State of Indiana
as 4:2024cv00068
Petitioner:
Alomandos Hawkins
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CLAY v. WARDEN
as 3:2024cv00169
Petitioner:
DAMIAN CLAY
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
