Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Croom v. Kennedy et al
as 1:2021cv01197
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Croom
Defendant:
Teri Kennedy, . Torres, Lt . Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LTC Partners, LLC et al v. Wilkey et al
as 1:2019cv06190
Plaintiff:
LTC Partners, LLC and Joel Dryer
Defendant:
Duane Wilkey, ADW Partners, LLC and Aaron Wilkey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Knox v. Tilden et al
as 1:2016cv01499
Plaintiff:
Christopher Knox
Defendant:
Andrew Tilden, . Shicker, . Funk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cuprisin v. Tilden et al
as 1:2016cv01477
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Cuprisin
Defendant:
Andrew Tilden, . Shicker, S. A. Godinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Old Republic Surety Company v. Heavy Haulers, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv05397
Plaintiff:
Old Republic Surety Company
Defendant:
Heavy Haulers, Inc., Compunet Credit Services LLC, TII Family of Companies and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Jackson v. Godinez et al
as 1:2014cv01108
Plaintiff:
Joel Jackson
Defendant:
S.A. Godinez , Michael P. Randle, Richard Birkey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Godinez et al
as 1:2013cv02888
Plaintiff:
Joel Jackson
Defendant:
S.A. Godinez , Michael P. Randle, Richard Birkey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilkey et al v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv11675
Plaintiff:
Donna C. Wilkey and Bill Wilkey
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer Pharma AG, Barr Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Wilkey et al v. Sheriff's Department of Randolph County, Illinois et al
as 3:2009cv00720
Plaintiff:
David Wilkey and Marty M. Lohmeyer
Defendant:
Sheriff's Department of Randolph County, Illinois, Allen Young, Janice Barbour and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
