Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Emcasco Insurance Company v. Bright et al
as 4:2021cv01150
Plaintiff:
Emcasco Insurance Company
Defendant:
Susie Bright Individually doing business as Bright Heating & Air, Alfred Frederick Currie, III and Stephanie Currie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Dunahue v. Payne et al
as 4:2021cv00959
Plaintiff:
Reginald L Dunahue
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Marshall D Reed, Aundrea Culclager and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones et al v. Dominicis et al
as 3:2021cv00732
Plaintiff:
Eugene Jones and Wellpath LLC
Defendant:
Jorge Dominicis, Geore Wilson, Arkansas Division of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Dominicis et al
as 4:2021cv00731
Plaintiff:
Eugene Jones
Defendant:
Jorge Dominicis, Geore Wilson, Arkansas Division of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bottorff v. Dominicis et al
as 4:2021cv00732
Plaintiff:
Eugene Jones, Wellpath LLC and Victor Sean Bottorff
Defendant:
Jorge Dominicis, Geore Wilson, Arkansas Division of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kimball v. Culclager et al
as 4:2021cv00348
Defendant:
Curry Branham, Jeremy Andrews, Justus Motton and others
Plaintiff:
Tommy J Kimball
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanders et al v. Bennett Truck Transport LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00047
Defendant:
John Does and Bennett Truck Transport LLC
Plaintiff:
Yamaya Sanders and Anthony Curry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Curry-Fishtorn v. Norwood et al
as 4:2020cv00974
Defendant:
Jim Smith, David Norwood and Cameron Owens
Plaintiff:
Alexander Curry-Fishtorn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pitts v. Smith et al
as 5:2019cv00218
Defendant:
Curry Branham, Bass, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Pitts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce v. Marshall et al
as 3:2017cv00242
Plaintiff:
Jason Lloyd Pierce
Defendant:
Patricia Marshall, Steve Rorex and Robert Curry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
