Cases 61 - 70 of 19,489
Titus v. World Book et al
as 6:2024cv06039
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus
Defendant:
World Book, Nike Distribution Centers, Craig Mack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Turner v. Prince
as 6:2024cv06070
Plaintiff:
Henry Darnell Turner
Defendant:
Brandy Prince
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. McClean et al
as 4:2024cv04051
Plaintiff:
Curtis Wayne Smith, Jr and Curtis Wayne Dale Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Joan McClean, Officer Todd Tallant, Does Badge Number 11-6 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Striegel v. White et al
as 6:2024cv06069
Plaintiff:
Nathan F. Striegel
Defendant:
Warden White, Major Otts and Lt. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 5:2024cv05111
Plaintiff:
Carl Armon Perkins
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
N2N Global, Inc. v. Walmart, Inc.
as 5:2024cv05110
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
N2N Global, Inc.
Hopper v. Chancey et al
as 2:2024cv02040
Plaintiff:
Danny Hopper
Defendant:
Deputy Brandon Chancey, Former Prosecutor Rinda Baker, Prosecutor Kevin Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mears v. Tyson Poultry, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02043
Plaintiff:
David Mears
Defendant:
Tyson Poultry, Inc. and Tyson Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
