Cases 11 - 20 of 1,376
Joshua Stockton v. Joe Page, et al
as 23-3770
Plaintiff:
Joshua Matthew Stockton
Defendant:
Joe Page, Superintendant, Pine Bluf Unit, ADC, Arkansas Department of Correction, Mary Cobbs, Major, Pine Bluff Coplex and others
Fielding Kimery v. Dexter Payne, et al
as 23-3649
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Fielding Vaughn Kimery
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, James Gibson, Warden, Varner/Varner Supermax, Brandon Carroll, Deputy Warden, Varner Supermax and others
Daniel Pedraza v. Arkansas Department of Correction, et al
as 23-3608
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Daniel Pedraza
Defendant / Appellee:
Arkansas Department of Correction, G. Musselwhite, Warden, Arkansas Department of Corrections, Cummins Unit, Robert L. Pierce, Deputy Warden of Security, Arkansas Department of Corrections, Cummins Unit and others
Cardell Hunes v. Dexter Payne
as 23-3577
Petitioner:
Cardell Hunes
Respondent:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Roderick Rankin v. Dexter Payne
as 23-3526
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Roderick Leshun Rankin
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction (originally named as Ray Hobbs)
Lawrence Martin v. Dexter Payne
as 23-3505
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lawrence Martin
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Myron Anderson v. Dexter Payne
as 23-3383
Petitioner:
Myron Newjean Anderson
Respondent:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Cardell Hunes v. Dexter Payne
as 23-3330
Petitioner:
Cardell Hunes
Respondent:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Richard Shreck v. Dexter Payne
as 23-3241
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Richard Shreck
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Cardell Hunes v. Dexter Payne
as 23-3067
Petitioner:
Cardell Hunes
Respondent:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
