Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Gyronne Buckley v. Keith Ray, et al
as 15-3656
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Gyronne Buckley
Defendant - Appellee:
Keith Ray, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Agent operating under the authority of the South Central Drug Task Force, Linda Card, Individually and in her Official Capacity as Agent operating under the authority of the South Central Drug Task Force, Richard Wiggins, "Rip" Individually and in his Official Capacity as Agent operating under the authority of the South Central Drug Task Force and others
Gyronne Buckley v. Keith Ray, et al
as 15-3481
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Gyronne Buckley
Defendant - Appellee:
Keith Ray, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Agent operating under the authority of the South Central Drug Task Force, Linda Card, Individually and in her Official Capacity as Agent operating under the authority of the South Central Drug Task Force, Richard Wiggins, "Rip" Individually and in his Official Capacity as Agent operating under the authority of the South Central Drug Task Force and others
United States v. Jeremy Phelp
as 15-2779
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Jeremy Phelps
Coy Phelps v. Linda Sander
as 15-1702
Petitioner - Appellant:
Coy R. Phelps
Respondent - Appellee:
Linda Sanders, Warden
Coy Phelps v. Eric H. Holder, et al
as 15-1286
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Coy R. Phelps
Defendant - Appellee:
Eric Holder, U.S. Attorney General, Charles Samuels, FBOP Chief Administrative Officer, Linda Sanders, Warden and others
Shirley Phelps-Roper v. Chris Koster, et al
as 15-1102
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Shirley Phelps-Roper
Defendant - Appellee:
Chris Koster, in his official capacity as Attorney General for the State of Missouri, Jeremiah W. Nixon, in his official capacity as Governor for the State of Missouri and Ronald K. Repogle, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Missouri State Highway Patrol
Defendant:
Mark Goodwin, in his official capacity as Prosecuting Attorney for Carroll County, Angie Hemphill Wright, in her official capacity as Prosecuting Attorney for Laclede County, Richard E. Wrinkle, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Laclede County and others
Shirley Phelps-Roper v. Chris Koster, et al
as 14-3266
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Shirley Phelps-Roper
Defendant - Appellant:
Chris Koster, in his official capacity as Attorney General for the State of Missouri, Jeremiah W. Nixon, in his official capacity as Governor for the State of Missouri and Ronald K. Repogle, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Missouri State Highway Patrol
Defendant:
Mark Goodwin, in his official capacity as Prosecuting Attorney for Carroll County, Angie Hemphill Wright, in her official capacity as Prosecuting Attorney for Laclede County, Richard E. Wrinkle, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Laclede County and others
Shirley Phelps-Roper v. Chris Koster, et al
as 14-3058
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Shirley Phelps-Roper
Defendant - Appellee:
Chris Koster, in his official capacity as Attorney General for the State of Missouri, Jeremiah W. Nixon, in his official capacity as Governor for the State of Missouri and Ronald K. Repogle, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Missouri State Highway Patrol
Defendant:
Mark Goodwin, in his official capacity as Prosecuting Attorney for Carroll County, Angie Hemphill Wright, in her official capacity as Prosecuting Attorney for Laclede County, Richard E. Wrinkle, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Laclede County and others
Christopher Lester v. Bradford Phelps, et al
as 14-2604
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Christopher Michael Lester
Defendant - Appellee:
Bradford J. Phelps, Chief Deputy, Arkansas Attorney General, Marvin Evans, Jr., Deputy Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, William Straughn, Warden, Tucker Unit, ADC and others
Shirley Phelps-Roper, et al v. County of St. Charle
as 14-1008
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Shirley L. Phelps-Roper and Megan Phelps-Roper
Defendant - Appellee:
County of St. Charles, Missouri
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
