Cases 21 - 30 of 1,376
Cardell Hunes v. Dexter Payne
as 23-3067
Petitioner:
Cardell Hunes
Respondent:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Michael Pickens v. Dexter Payne
as 23-2665
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Pickens
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Charles Jones, Sr. v. Dexter Payne
as 23-2919
Petitioner:
Charles Edward Jones, Sr.
Respondent:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Anthony Williamson v. Dexter Payne
as 23-2740
Petitioner:
Anthony Brian Williamson
Respondent:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Fredrick Pennington, Jr. v. Dexter Payne, et al
as 23-2478
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Frederick Pennington, Jr. and Fredrick Pennington, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Leslie Rutledge, Former Arkansas Attorney General, Terri Hollingsworth, Pulaski Circuit Clerk and others
Anthony Thrash v. Dexter Payne
as 23-2727
Petitioner:
Anthony Thrash
Respondent:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Cardell Hunes v. Dexter Payne
as 23-2695
Petitioner:
Cardell Hunes
Respondent:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Albert Lewis, Jr. v. Dexter Payne
as 23-2693
Petitioner:
Albert Lee Lewis, Jr.
Respondent:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Frank Watts, II v. Asa Hutchinson, et al
as 23-2284
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Frank Watts, II
Defendant / Appellee:
Asa Hutchinson, Hon. Governor, and/or His Predecessors & Successor, Morris Thompson, Former Cir. Ct. Judge & Law Firm, and/or His Successor, Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of Corrections, and/or Her Predecessors & Successor and others
Anthony Williamson v. Dexter Payne
as 23-2651
Petitioner:
Anthony Brian Williamson
Respondent:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
