Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Cases 21 - 30 of 407
Sumaya Aden v. City of Eagan, et al
as 23-3391
Plaintiff / Appellee: Sumaya Aden, as next-of-kin and trustee for the Estate of Isak Abdirahman Aden, Decedent
Defendant: City of Bloomington, Minnesota, City of Burnsville, Minnesota, City of Edina, Minnesota and others
Defendant / Appellant: City of Eagan, Minnesota, Officer Jacob Peterson, Officer Matthew Ryan and others
Timothy Whittle v. Camden County Sheriff's Dept. and Corrections Div., et al
as 23-3388
Plaintiff / Appellant: Timothy Whittle
Defendant / Appellee: Camden County Sheriff's Department, and Corrections Division, Anthony Helms, Camden County Sheriff, Bollard, Camden County Deputy Sheriff and others
Eugene Johnson v. Marc Magnuson, et al
as 23-3376
Plaintiff / Appellant: Eugene Laron Johnson
Defendant: Correctional Facility Moose Lake, Kris Rish and Office Special Investigators-OSI
Defendant / Appellee: Sergeant Marc Magnuson, Lieutenant Rich Skoglund, Captain Crystal Hansen and others
DeQuincy Smith v. Ahmari Caffey, et al
as 23-3322
Plaintiff / Appellant: DeQuincy Smith
Defendant / Appellee: Ahmari Caffey, Sergeant, Maximum Security Unit, ADC, Head, Field Captain, Maximum Security Unit, ADC, Maurice Culclager, Deputy Warden, Maximum Security Unit, ADC and others
Mark Stinson, Sr. v. K. Cauley, et al
as 23-3306
Plaintiff / Appellant: Mark T. Stinson, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee: K. Cauley, BOP Officer FCI Forrest City, AR. Sued in individual and official capacity, Hall, Asst. Warden, FCI Forrest City, AR. Sued in individual and official capacity, Thomas, Camp Admin, FCI Forrest City, AR. Sued in individual and official capacity and others
Mark Stinson, Sr. v. John Yates, et al
as 23-3269
Plaintiff / Appellant: Mark T. Stinson, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee: John P. Yates, Warden, FCI Forrest City, Blair, Camp Unit Manager, FCI Forrest City, Rendon, Camp Counselor, FCI Forrest City and others
Jared Goyette, et al v. David Hutchinson
as 23-3190
Plaintiff / Appellee: Jared Goyette, On behalf of themselves and other similarly situated individuals, Craig Lassig, On behalf of themselves and other similarly situated individuals, Communications Workers of America, On behalf of themselves and other similarly situated individuals and others
Plaintiff: Michael Shum
Defendant / Appellant: City of Minneapolis, Medaria Arradondo, Minneapolis Chief of Police, in his individual and official capacity, Robert Kroll, Minneapolis Police Lieutenant, in his individual and official capacity and others
Defendant: John Does, 1-2, in their individual and official capacities
Donald Winnett v. Matthew Winston, et al
as 23-3052
Plaintiff / Appellant: Donald Felix Winnett
Defendant / Appellee: Matthew R. Winston, Sergeant, Pine Bluff Unit, ADC, Evens, Corporal, Disciplinary Officer, Pine Bluff Unit, ADC, Bolden, Assistant Warden, Pine Bluff Unit, ADC and others
Defendant: Keontis M. Walker, Lieutenant, Pine Bluff Unit, ADC, Mary Cobbs, Major, Pine Bluff Unit, ADC and Sgt. Roberts, Pine Bluff Unit, ADC
Reginald Dunahue v. Dexter Payne, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-2840
Plaintiff / Appellant: Reginald L. Dunahue
Defendant / Appellee: Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Marshall Dale Reed, Chief Deputy, Arkansas Department of Correction, Jeremy C. Andrews, Warden, EARU, ADC and others
Defendant: Morieon Kelly, Captain, EARU, ADC, Latosha Davis, Lieutenant, EARU, ADC, Kathy Baxter, Corporal/S.E.T. Team, East Arkansas Maximum Security Unit, ADC (originally named as K Baxter) and others
Paul Criswell v. Nathan Johnston
as 23-2809
Plaintiff / Appellant: Paul William Criswell
Defendant: City of Bryant, Bryant Police Department, Does, 15, City of Bryant Mayor, Bryant Police Chief, Police Officer, Patrol and Shift Lieutenant and others
Defendant / Appellee: Nathan Johnston, Patrol Officer, Bryant Police Department

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?