Cases 31 - 40 of 44
Bong Chae v. Robert Houston
as 11-1586
Petitioner - Appellant:
Bong H. Chae
Respondent - Appellee:
Robert Houston, Director of Dept. of Correctional Services
Roger Sims v. Ray Hobb
as 11-1444
Petitioner:
Roger Dale Sims
Respondent:
Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Dept. of Corrections
Jim Harris, Jr. v. Ellis McSwain, et al
as 11-1320
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jim Harris, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Ellis McSwain and MO Dept. of Corrections
Defendant:
Lili T. Adams, Lisa Looten, Richard Hart and others
Shyheim El-Mumin v. Larry Crawford, et al
as 10-3735
Plaintiff:
C. J. Stewart and Benjamin Darden
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Shyheim D. El-Mumin, also known as James Lenoir
Defendant - Appellee:
Larry Crawford, Dave Dormire, A Woods and others
C. Stewart v. Larry Crawford, et al
as 10-3734
Plaintiff - Appellant:
C. J. Stewart
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Darden and Shyheim D. El-Mumin
Defendant - Appellee:
Larry Crawford, Dave Dormire, A Woods and others
John Varnon v. Missouri Dept. of Corrections, et al
as 10-2690
Plaintiff - Appellant:
John Varnon
Defendant - Appellee:
Missouri Dept. of Corrections and George Lombardi
Richard Samuels v. Nebraska Dept. of Corrections, et al
as 10-2017
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Richard Z. Samuels
Defendant - Appellee:
Nebraska Dept. of Corrections, Nebraska State Penitentiary and Dr. Frederick Hathaway, Orthopedic Surgeon
Cregg Matthews v. Dr. Karl Saffo, et al
as 10-1582
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Cregg L. Matthews
Defendant:
MO Dept. of Corrections, Western Missouri Correctional Center, CMS Medical Service and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Dr. Karl Saffo and Joy Hailey
Leonard Noble v. Ray Hobb
as 10-1505
Petitioner:
Leonard Noble
Respondent:
Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Dept. of Corrections
Michele Moore v. Joyce Plock, et al
as 10-1250
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michele Cherie Chapman Moore
Defendant - Appellee:
Joyce Plock, State of Nebraska, York Penitentary for Women and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
