Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Timothy Joyner v. Dexter Payne
as 24-1458
Plaintiff:
Timothy Justin Joyner
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Division of Correction
Richard Hershey v. Dr. John Jasinski, et al
as 22-2236
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Richard Hershey
Defendant / Appellant:
Dr. John Jasinski, President of Northwest Missouri State University, in his official capacity, Dr. Pat Harr, Member of the Board of Regents of Northwest Missouri State University, in his official capacity, Dr. Marilou Joyner, Member of the Board of Regents of Northwest Missouri State University, in her official capacity and others
Defendant:
Dr. Jay Johnson, Interim Director of Northwest Missouri State University, Kansas City Campus, in his official capacity
Richard Hershey v. Dr. John Jasinski, et al
as 22-1941
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Richard Hershey
Defendant / Appellee:
Dr. John Jasinski, President of Northwest Missouri State University, in his official capacity, Dr. Pat Harr, Member of the Board of Regents of Northwest Missouri State University, in his official capacity, Dr. Marilou Joyner, Member of the Board of Regents of Northwest Missouri State University, in her official capacity and others
Defendant:
Dr. Jay Johnson, Interim Director of Northwest Missouri State University, Kansas City Campus, in his official capacity
Richard Hershey v. Dr. John Jasinski, et al
as 22-1826
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Richard Hershey
Defendant / Appellant:
Dr. John Jasinski, President of Northwest Missouri State University, in his official capacity, Dr. Pat Harr, Member of the Board of Regents of Northwest Missouri State University, in his official capacity, Dr. Marilou Joyner, Member of the Board of Regents of Northwest Missouri State University, in her official capacity and others
Defendant:
Dr. Jay Johnson, Interim Director of Northwest Missouri State University, Kansas City Campus, in his official capacity
Alex Nelson, et al v. City of St. Louis, Missouri, et al
as 21-3740
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Alex Nelson and Iris Nelson
Defendant / Appellant:
City of St. Louis, Missouri, Gerald Leyshock, COI, in his individual and official capacities, Scott Boyher, LT., in his individual and official capacities and others
Defendant:
John Does 1-5, in their individual and official capacities, Charlene Deeken and John Does, 1-3
Mark Gullet v. City of St. Louis, et al
as 21-3745
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Mark Gullet
Defendant / Appellant:
City of St. Louis, Scott Boyher, LT., in his individual and official capacities, Timothy Sachs, LT., in his individual and official capacities and others
Defendant:
Charlene Deeken
Emily Davis v. Gerald Leyshock, et al
as 21-3526
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Emily Davis
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, Missouri, John Does 1-5, in their individual and official capacities and Charlene Deeken
Defendant / Appellant:
Gerald Leyshock, COL., in his individual and official capacities, Scott Boyher, LT., in his individual and official capacities, Timothy Sachs, LT., in his individual and official capacities and others
Dillan Newbold v. Gerald Leyshock, et al
as 21-3108
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Dillan Newbold
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, Missouri, John Does 1-5, in their individual and official capacities, Terrence Ruffin and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Gerald Leyshock, COL., in his individual an official capacities, Scott Boyher, LT., in his individual and official capacities, Timothy Sachs, T., in his individual and official capacities and others
Leonard Hill v. Warden Hector Joyner, et al
as 21-1786
Respondent:
Warden, County of Residence: U.S.P. Pollock, Warden, County of Residencre: OKC Federal Hold-over, Hector Joyner, Warden, County of Residence: U.S.P. Big Sandy and others
Petitioner:
Leonard Dwayne Hill
Robbie Amburgey, et al v. 3M Company, et al
as 20-3634
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Jesse Spears, Thomas Williams, Ronald Carmouche and others
Defendant / Appellant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
