Cases 1 - 10 of 684
Leslie Torgerson v. Roberts County of South Dakota, et al
as 24-1931
Plaintiff:
Leslie Torgerson
Defendant:
Roberts County of South Dakota, Tyler Appel, in his individual and official capacities, Zachary Angerhofer, in his individual and official capacities and others
United States v. Terry Campie
as 24-1901
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Terry Marshall Campie
Terry Finch v. United States
as 24-1858
Petitioner:
Terry D. Finch
Respondent:
United States of America
United States, et al v. D.S. Medical LLC, et al
as 24-1809
Plaintiff:
United States of America, ex rel.
Defendant / Appellee:
Paul Cairns, Terry Cleaver, M.D., Kyle Colle, M.D. and others
Defendant:
D.S. Medical LLC, Midwest Family Care, LLC, Midwest Neurosurgeons, LLC and others
United States v. Terry Briggs
as 24-1671
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Terry L. Briggs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1632
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
United States v. Terry Christianson
as 24-1528
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Terry L. Christianson
Peter Allan, Sr., et al v. Minnesota DHS, et al
as 24-1329
Plaintiff:
Peter Allan, Sr., Russell Hatton, Michael D. Benson and others
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, Jodi Harpstead, in her official capacity as Commissioner of Department of Human Services, Marshall Smith, in his official capacity as Chief Executive Director of Direct Care and Treatment for the Minnesota Sex Offender Program and others
Hollis Larson v. Minnesota Sex Offender Program, et al
as 24-1318
Plaintiff:
Hollis J. Larson
Defendant:
Minnesota Sex Offender Program, (MSOP), Lucinda Jesson, All sued in their individual capacities, and variously sued in their official capacities, Cal Ludeman, All sued in their individual capacities, and variously sued in their official capacities and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
