Cases 81 - 90 of 6,394
Taylor v. North County Police Cooperative et al
as 4:2024cv00274
Plaintiff:
Demario Taylor
Defendant:
North County Police Cooperative, City of Dellwood, City of Pine Lawn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00345
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00554
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
La Scola v. SSM Medical Group, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00564
Plaintiff:
Deborah La Scola, M.D.
Defendant:
SSM Medical Group, Inc. and St. Louis University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Sapa v. Eminem et al
as 4:2024cv00451
Plaintiff:
Matthew Sapa
Defendant:
Eminem, Hollywood and St. Louis FBI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mooney et al v. Hussmann Corporation
as 4:2024cv00562
Plaintiff:
S. Mooney and Panasonic Corporation of North America
Defendant:
Hussmann Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00561
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00563
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00552
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
