Cases 1 - 10 of 202
Shelby v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2024cv00759
Plaintiff:
Jimmy DeWayne Shelby
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, State of Missouri, Phyllis M. Byland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walton v. Keen
as 4:2024cv00537
Plaintiff:
DeAndre D. Walton
Defendant:
Daniel Keen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. USA
as 4:2024cv00518
Petitioner:
Daniel Henderson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Trotter v. Miller et al
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Daniel Trotter
Defendant:
Wendy Marie Miller, Whithney Conney, Howard Michael and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kennemore v. Anderson
as 4:2024cv00465
Petitioner:
Daniel Eldon Kennemore
Respondent:
Donna Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kennemore v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2024cv00467
Plaintiff:
Daniel Eldon Kennemore
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Donna Anderson, Stacey Neff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kennemore v. Anderson et al
as 4:2024cv00468
Plaintiff:
Daniel Eldon Kennemore
Defendant:
Donna Anderson, Stacey Neff and All State Physicians Who Are Listed As Witches in the Library Occult/Witchcraft Books
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paul v. Davis et al
as 4:2024cv00458
Plaintiff:
Rico Paul
Defendant:
Brian Davis, Caleb Thompson, Justin Conway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKay v. Vandergriff
as 4:2024cv00385
Petitioner:
Daniel McKay
Respondent:
David Vandergriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harper v. Monnig et al
as 4:2024cv00297
Plaintiff:
Christopher Louis Harper
Defendant:
Shane Monnig, Timothy Baker, Adam Lemmonds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
