Cases 1 - 10 of 1,053
K.D.H. v. Boone County, Missouri et al
as 2:2024cv04084
Plaintiff:
K. D. H.
Defendant:
Boone County, Missouri, Daymon Reynolds, Christie McCalebb and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Doe et al v. GEICO Casualty Company
as 4:2024cv00339
Plaintiff:
John Doe, Jack Doe and Jane Doe
Defendant:
GEICO Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Brazell v. Lindsey et al
as 6:2024cv03110
Plaintiff:
Jason Brazell
Defendant:
Scott Lindsey, Texas County Memorial Hospital, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Johnson v. Doe I et al
as 6:2024cv03116
Plaintiff:
Wayne T Johnson
Defendant:
John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Courtright v. Epic Games, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv04055
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Epic Games, Inc., Roblox Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Carey Courtwright and Carey Courtright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Moseley v. Henderson et al
as 4:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Kelshaun D Moseley
Defendant:
Henderson, Watson, Ahka and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Horton v. Mars, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
Paul Horton
Defendant:
Mars, Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Humes v. T-Mobile Security John Doe
as 4:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee Humes
Defendant:
T-Mobile Security John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
T.F. v. Gerber Products Company et al
as 4:2024cv00201
Plaintiff:
T.F. and Toiyanna Boyd
Defendant:
Gerber Products Company, Nestle S.A., Beech-Nut Nutrition Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
