Cases 111 - 120 of 31,156
Tuttle v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv04052
Plaintiff:
Lisa L. Tuttle
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Dickau v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv01011
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Dickau
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 423 Social Security Act (Disability Insurance Benefit Payments)
Lee v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv01137
Plaintiff:
Lia Lee
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Pesek v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv01139
Plaintiff:
Jason Pesek
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Meh v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv01140
Plaintiff:
Nyay Meh
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Rubottom-Langeneckert v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Jamie Lynn Rubottom-Langeneckert
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
McCabe v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Holly L. McCabe
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Brower v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00498
Plaintiff:
Sarah Brower
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Enos v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00499
Plaintiff:
Tracy Enos
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Laramie v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00500
Plaintiff:
Savannah Laramie
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
