Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Corrugated Erectors Inc v. AMR Construction LLC et al
as 4:2012cv00540
Plaintiff:
Corrugated Erectors Inc
Defendant:
AMR Construction LLC and Employer Mutual Casualty Company
Cross_claimant:
Employer Mutual Casualty Company
Cross_defendant:
AMR Construction LLC
Counter_claimant:
Employer Mutual Casualty Company
Counter_defendant:
Corrugated Erectors Inc
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Elliott Electric Supply Inc v. LRE/Royal Electric LLC et al
as 3:2012cv00146
Plaintiff:
Elliott Electric Supply Inc
Defendant:
LRE/Royal Electric LLC, Employers Mutual Casualty Company, W G Yates & Sons Construction Company and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
United States of America v. AMR Construction et al
as 6:2010cv06083
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
AMR Construction, LLC and Employers Mutual Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3133
United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Comark Building Systems, Inc. v. Iowa Tribe of Oklahoma et al
as 6:2009cv03195
Plaintiff:
United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Comark Building Systems, Inc.
Defendant:
Iowa Tribe of Oklahoma, BKJ Solutions, Inc. and Employer's Mutual Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3113 Condemnation
Fite Electric Company Inc v. Patton Contractors Inc et al
as 4:2008cv00638
Plaintiff:
Fite Electric Company Inc
Defendant:
Patton Contractors Inc and Employers Mutual Casualty Company and Union Insurance Company of Providence
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers et al v. Employers Mutual Casualty Company
as 4:2007cv00443
Plaintiff:
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local No. 347 Health & Welfare Fund, Trustees of The IBEW Local No. 347 Vacation Fund, Trustees of The IBEW Death Benefit Fund and others
Defendant:
Employers Mutual Casualty Company and John Vratsinas Commercial Builders Inc
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
