Cases 11 - 20 of 36,865
Garlett v. The Proctor & Gamble Company
as 4:2024cv00324
Plaintiff:
Elaina Garlett
Defendant:
The Proctor & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pyle v. Philips North America LLC et al
as 5:2024cv06061
Plaintiff:
David Pyles
Defendant:
Philips North America LLC, Philips Holding USA, Inc., Philips RS North America, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Davis v. Instant Brands LLC et al
as 0:2024cv01041
Plaintiff:
Analysia Davis
Defendant:
Instant Brands LLC, Instant Brands, Inc. and Corelle Brands, LLC
Julie Sprafka v. Medical Device Bus. Services, et al
as 24-1874
Plaintiff:
Julie Sprafka
Defendant:
Medical Device Business Services, Inc., an Indiana Corporation, formerly known as DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
Craig Dibble v. Torax Medical, Inc., et al
as 24-1385
Plaintiff:
Craig Dibble
Defendant:
Torax Medical, Inc. and Ethicon, Inc.
Derrick v. Novo Nordisk A/S et al
as 6:2024cv02018
Plaintiff:
Shawn Derrick
Defendant:
Novo Nordisk A/S, NOVO NORDISK NORTH AMERICA OPERATIONS A/S, NOVO NORDISK US HOLDINGS INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Karen Carroll, et al v. Brunswick Corporation, et al
as 24-1474
Plaintiff:
Karen Carroll, Honor Carroll, Trace Carroll, As the Surviving Heirs and Administratrix of the Estate of Shawn E. Carroll, Deceased and others
Defendant:
Brunswick Corporation, Sea Ray Boats and Brunswick Boat Group
Myers v. Bunn-O-Matic Corporation et al
as 6:2024cv06016
Plaintiff:
Abigail Myers
Defendant:
Bunn-O-Matic Corporation and Vixxo Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Emrit v. Combs et al
as 5:2024cv05056
Defendant:
Sean Combs, P. Diddy, Bad Boy Entertainment and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
