Other Civil Rights Cases filed in the Eighth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Ruthie Walls, et al v. Jacob Oliva, et al
as 24-1990
Plaintiff: Ruthie Walls, Jennifer Reynolds, as next friend of Sadie Annabella Reynolds, Chandra Williams Davis, as Next Friend of Giselle Davis and others
Defendant: Sarah Sanders, in her official capacity as Governor of the State of Arkansas, Jacob Oliva, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Arkansas Department of Education, and individually, Sarah Moore, in her official capacity as Member of the Arkansas State Board of Education and others
Rosie Davis v. William Franks
as 24-1927
Plaintiff: Rosie L. Davis
Defendant: William Dale Franks
Intervenor: Arkansas Department of Education, The and Arkansas State Board of Education, The
Mary Turner, et al v. Lafayette County School District, et al
as 24-1928
Plaintiff: Mary Turner, Individually and as next friend of Torrance Turner, a minor, Lucy Cheatham, Individually and as next friend of Andrew Cheatham, a minor, Mary Rose, Individually and as next friend of Victor Rose and others
Defendant: Lafayette County School District, Larry Hudson, Individually and in his official capacity as Superintendent of Schools for the Lewisville School District No. 1, A Public Body Corporate, Hollis Sasser, Individually and in his official capacity as President of the Board of Education of the Lewisville School District No. 1, A Public Body Corporate and others
Intervenor: Arkansas Department of Education and Arkansas State Board of Education
Vollmecke v. Independence School District et al
as 4:2023cv00644
Plaintiff: Jason Vollmecke
Defendant: Independence School District, Independence School District Board of Education and Dale Herl
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gilbert v. Cameron R-1 School District et al
as 5:2023cv06084
Plaintiff: Heath Gilbert
Defendant: Cameron R-1 Public Schools doing business as Cameron R-1 School District and Cameron R-1 Board of Education
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brooke Henderson, et al v. Springfield R-12 School District, et al
as 23-1880
Plaintiff / Appellant: Brooke Henderson and Jennifer Lumley
Defendant / Appellee: Springfield R-12 School District, Board of Education, of the Springfield R-12 School District, Grenita Lathan and others
Defendant: Martha Doenning
Appellant: Americans for Prosperity Foundation, Alliance Defending Freedom, Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression and others
Brooke Henderson, et al v. Springfield R-12 School District, et al
as 23-1374
Plaintiff / Appellant: Brooke Henderson and Jennifer Lumley
Defendant / Appellee: Springfield R-12 School District, Board of Education, of the Springfield R-12 School District, Grenita Lathan and others
Defendant: Martha Doenning
Plaintiff A, et al v. Park Hill School District, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-1119
Plaintiff / Appellant: Plaintiff A, by his natural mother and general guardian, PARENT A, Plaintiff B, by his natural father and general guardian, PARENT B, Plaintiff C, by his natural mother and general guardian, PARENT C and others
Defendant / Appellee: Park Hill School District, Janice Bolin, President and Member, Park Hill School District Board of Education, Bart Klein, Vice President and Member, Park Hill School District Board of Education and others
Brandon et al v. Board of Education of the City of St. Louis, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00635
Plaintiff: Wanda Brandon, Andrew Craig, Alice Crockett and others
Defendant: Board of Education of the City of St. Louis, Missouri, Kelvin R. Adams, Charles K. Burton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Koch et al v. Taylor et al
as 4:2022cv00229
Plaintiff: Michele Koch and Kendal Koch
Defendant: Kayla Taylor, Steven Meyers, Lauren Goddard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?