Cases 1 - 7 of 7
North Metro Harness Initiative LLC v. Beattie et al
as 0:2024cv01369
Plaintiff:
North Metro Harness Initiative LLC doing business as Running Aces
Defendant:
Michael Beattie, Craig Beaulieu, Raymond Brenny and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Hunter v. Murdoch et al
as 0:2019cv00590
Defendant:
William J. Clinton Foundation, The, Paul Watcher AT&T Inc., City of Saint Paul and others
Plaintiff:
Dannez Hunter
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Cedar Rapids Lodge & Suites v. Lightowler Johnson Assoc.
as 12-3919
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Cedar Rapids Lodge & Suites, LLC
Plaintiff:
James T. Rymes, Rhonda L. Coborn, Michael Coborn and others
Defendant:
JFS Development, Inc., formerly known as JCS Development, Inc., John F. Seibert and Ted Vosburg
Defendant - Appellee:
Lightowler Johnson Associates, Inc.
Cedar Rapids Lodge & Suites v. Lightowler Johnson Assoc.
as 12-1625
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Cedar Rapids Lodge & Suites, LLC
Plaintiff:
James T. Rymes, Rhonda L. Coborn, Michael Coborn and others
Defendant:
JFS Development, Inc., formerly known as JCS Development, Inc., John F. Seibert and Ted Vosburg
Defendant - Appellee:
Lightowler Johnson Associates, Inc.
Raymond v. Leal et al
as 3:2011cv00073
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey E Raymond
Defendant:
Michael S Leal, Jacob Drumm, Joseph Hassman and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Cedar Rapids Lodge & Suites, LLC et al v. JFS Development, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00175
Plaintiff:
Cedar Rapids Lodge & Suites, LLC, Cedar Rapids Lodge & Suites, LLC, James T Rymes and others
Defendant:
JFS Development, Inc., John F Seibert, Ted Vosburg and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
McConnell et al v. Global Guardians et al
as 3:2007cv00049
Defendant:
Ralph M Barford, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Jamie Gorelick and others
Plaintiff:
Does Fellow Plaintiffs 1-98, David Hawkins and Field McConnell
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
