Cases 11 - 20 of 578
Davis v. Rardin
as 0:2023cv01675
Petitioner:
William Scott Davis, Jr.
Respondent:
Jared Rardin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
William Davis, Jr. v. Jared Rardin, et al
as 23-2315
Petitioner / Appellant:
William Scott Davis, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
Jared Rardin, Warden FMC Rochester, Collette Peters, F.B.O.P. Director and Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General of the United States
Clifford Gooden, III v. Tim Lane
as 23-2277
Petitioner / Appellant:
Clifford A. Gooden, III
Respondent / Appellee:
Tim Lane, Sheriff of Scott County Jail
Bell v. Scott County Officials et al
as 4:2023cv00162
Petitioner:
Larry Dean Bell, Sr.
Respondent:
Scott County Officials and State of Iowa
Interested Party:
Aaron Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Faul v. King
as 0:2023cv01337
Petitioner:
Scott William Faul
Respondent:
Mark W. King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Luke v. Iowa
as 3:2023cv03012
Petitioner:
Scott Randolph Luke
Respondent:
State of Iowa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
William Davis, Jr. v. Jared Rardin, et al
as 23-1655
Petitioner / Appellant:
William Scott Davis, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
Jared Rardin, Warden F.M.C. Rochester MN, Merrick B. Garland, U.S.A.G. and Collette Peters, Director F.B.O.P.
Davis v. Rardin et al
as 0:2023cv00651
Petitioner:
William Scott Davis, Jr.
Respondent:
Jared Rardin, Colette S. Peters and Merrick Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Peace Elluvasun Allah Cush-El v. Scott Anders
as 23-1436
Petitioner / Appellant:
Peace Elluvasun Allah Cush-El
Respondent / Appellee:
Scott Anders
Davis v. Weber
as 4:2023cv00077
Petitioner:
Bryce Davis
Respondent:
Scott Weber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
