Cases 71 - 80 of 3,808
Guthrie v. State of Arkansas Board of Parole
as 4:2024cv04012
Petitioner:
Norman Clay Guthrie
Respondent:
State of Arkansas Board of Parole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watkins v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Lynn Watkins
Defendant:
Doe and Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Garrett
as 2:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Shane Michael Brown
Defendant:
Doe and C Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Fitts v. Arkansas Department of Health and Human Services Children Division, Carroll County et al
as 3:2024cv03009
Petitioner:
Colby Blake Fitts
Respondent:
Arkansas Department of Health and Human Services Children Division, Carroll County and Carroll County Circuit Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Provencio v. Higgins
as 4:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
Kevin Wayne Provencio
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of and Eric Higgins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Conley v. Gibson
as 4:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Gary L Conley
Defendant:
James Gibson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Provencio v. Higgins
as 4:2024cv00209
Plaintiff:
Kevin Wayne Provencio
Defendant:
Sara Huckabee Sanders and Eric Higgins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ortega v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Francisco Raul Ortega
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kennedy v. Payne
as 4:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Kennedy
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Quinonez Venegas v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00037
Plaintiff:
Sergio Ivan Quinonez Venegas
Defendant:
Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
