Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Valentine v. Gable et al
as 8:2023cv00008
Petitioner:
Daejerron L. Valentine
Respondent:
Craig Gable and Douglas Peterson
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Johnson et al
as 8:2021cv00118
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Respondent:
Brad Johnson and Doug Peterson
Petitioner:
Eric M. Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Patton v. Frakes et al
as 8:2020cv00504
Respondent:
Scott Frakes, Todd Wasmer and Doug Peterson
Petitioner:
Marqus Patton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harden v. State of Nebraska et al
as 8:2019cv00492
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Respondent:
Doug Peterson, State of Nebraska, Scott Frakes and others
Petitioner:
Robert Harden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wesner v. Welhelm et al
as 8:2019cv00391
Respondent:
Scott Frakes, Douglas J. Peterson and Michele Welhelm
Petitioner:
Paul A. Wesner
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Peterson v. Lewis
as 4:2019cv00443
Respondent:
Jason Lewis
Petitioner:
Primalton H Peterson, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fransene v. Lane et al
as 4:2018cv00148
Petitioner:
Jason W Fransene
Respondent:
Tim Lane and Kevin Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Johnson v. Peterson
as 8:2018cv00124
Petitioner:
Craig A. Johnson
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Respondent:
Douglas J. Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Yanga v. State of Nebraska et al
as 8:2018cv00089
Respondent:
Scott Frakes, Madsen and State of Nebraska
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General and Douglas Peterson
Petitioner:
Emmanuel S. Yanga
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peterson v. Cassady
as 4:2017cv00592
Petitioner:
Zachariah Joel Peterson
Respondent:
Jay Cassady
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
