Cases 11 - 20 of 24
McCoy v. Department of Treasury et al
as 4:2021cv01099
Plaintiff:
Terry Lamar McCoy
Defendant:
Department of Treasury and Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gordon v. United States Department of the Treasury et al
as 4:2021cv00339
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Gordon
Defendant:
United States Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCoy v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 4:2021cv00935
Plaintiff:
Terry L McCoy
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service and Department of Treasury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyson v. Bieden Administration et al
as 4:2021cv00288
Plaintiff:
James Charles Tyson, Sr.
Defendant:
Bieden Administration and Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. USA et al
as 4:2021cv00377
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service and USA
Plaintiff:
Eugene Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dillon v. Department of Treasury et al
as 4:2021cv00242
Defendant:
Department of Treasury and Internal Revenue Service
Plaintiff:
Luther Wayne Dillon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pitts v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 4:2021cv00228
Defendant:
April Dyann Gibson, Department of Treasury, T Gibson and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Pitts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patton v. Department of Treasury et al
as 4:2021cv00045
Defendant:
Department of Treasury and Internal Revenue Service
Plaintiff:
Lamark D Patton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wheat v. Mnuchin
as 2:2021cv00005
Plaintiff:
Jason Wheat
Defendant:
Steve Mnuchin, Internal Revenue Service and U.S. Department of the Treasury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Avery v. Department of Treasury et al
as 4:2020cv01403
Defendant:
Department of Treasury, Does John and Jane, Bureau of Fiscal Service and others
Plaintiff:
Robert W Avery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
