Cases 61 - 70 of 79
Loving v. Roy et al
as 0:2012cv00551
Plaintiff:
Revelle Loving
Defendant:
Thomas Roy, Kent Grandlienard, David Reishus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burston v. Graham et al
as 1:2012cv00031
Plaintiff:
Ronald Dale Burston, Jr.
Defendant:
Russell Graham and Stephanie Novak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burston v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2011cv00221
Plaintiff:
Ronald Dale Burston, Jr.
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Buddy May, Daniel Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Bell, Jr. v. Michael Hakala, et al
as 11-3593
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Robert Bell, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Michael Hakala, Doctor, Chief Medical Doctor for CMS, Russell Graham, also known as Unknown Graham, Joyce Dickerson and others
Samson v. United States Government et al
as 0:2011cv03463
Plaintiff:
Ginette Samson
Defendant:
United States Government, Chad Meade, Deborah Trio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Molsbee v. Collie et al
as 5:2011cv06083
Plaintiff:
Robert A. Molsbee
Defendant:
Shawn Collie, Kate H Schaefer, Pamela Kay Blevins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mays v. Graham et al
as 0:2011cv02062
Plaintiff:
Michelle M. Mays
Defendant:
Mary Ellen Graham, Michael Isaacson, Dr. Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knight v. Correctional Medical Services et al
as 1:2011cv00124
Plaintiff:
Travis Knight
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Unknown Hakala, Unknown Babtich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graham v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole et al
as 2:2011cv04128
Plaintiff:
Frederick Ernest Graham
Defendant:
Missouri Board of Probation & Parole and WRDCC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. Hakala
as 1:2010cv00125
Plaintiff:
Robert Bell, Jr.
Defendant:
Michael Hakala, Unknown Graham and Unknown Dickerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
