Cases 41 - 50 of 136
Galvin v. Byers et al
as 5:2019cv00116
Defendant:
Davis, James Gibson, Dunlap and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick S Galvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Galvin v. Kelley
as 5:2019cv00117
Plaintiff:
Derrick S Galvin
Defendant:
Wendy Kelley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Derrick Galvin v. Wendy Kelley, et al
as 19-1577
Defendant / Appellee:
Brandon Caroll, Major, Varner/VSM, David Lieman, Owner, THV 11 News, Dhiraj Jeyanhomdurajan, Owner/Creator, Qneuros Technology and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Derrick S. Galvin
Galvin v. Carroll et al
as 5:2019cv00075
Defendant:
James Gibson, Wendy Kelley, Does Owner and Director, American Correctional Association; Owner, ADC; Owner, Varner Unit; Contractor, Varner Unit and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick S Galvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warner v. Rhodes et al
as 5:2019cv05033
Plaintiff:
Derrick Gerard Warner
Defendant:
Officer Mike Rhodes and Ronnie Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barber v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2019cv00013
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Department of Justice, Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Barber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Galvin v. Kelley et al
as 5:2018cv00316
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Ellen Degeneres, Wayne Brady and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick S Galvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Galvin v. Carroll et al
as 1:2018cv00093
Defendant:
Gibson, Carrol, Does Owner, Executive Owner, CEO, Assistant Owner, Secretary-Entergy Electrical Company; Maintenance Supervisor, All Maintenance Crews, Nurse, Medical Supervisor, All Infirmary-Varner Unit/VSM and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick S Galvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robertson v. Kelley et al
as 5:2018cv00288
Defendant:
Danny Burl, Cynthia Gaines and Wendy Kelley
Plaintiff:
Derrick Robertson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Galvin v. Jones et al
as 1:2018cv00087
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Wendy Kelley, Cortez Bryant and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick S Galvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
