Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Eddie Garey, Jr. v. Rhonda Langley, et al
as 22-3147
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Eddie Milton Garey, Jr., also known as Negro Garey
Defendant / Appellee:
Rhonda Langley, RN, FCC, Rosemary Stiles, Physicians Asst, FCCC, P. Benson, CO, FCCC and others
Martin v. Abdullah et al
as 2:2022cv00122
Plaintiff:
Patrick Ray Martin
Defendant:
J Abdullah, B Andrews, B Bass and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dews v. USA et al
as 2:2021cv00044
Plaintiff:
Maurice Dews and Maurice T Dews
Defendant:
Gene Beasley, Does Associate Warden, Forrest City; Captain, Forrest City and USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shelton v. Beasley
as 2:2018cv00177
Plaintiff:
Monty Shelton
Defendant:
Gene Beasley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2018cv00153
Defendant:
Brooke Boyles, Hendricks, United States Bureau of Prisons and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie Wayne Lane, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. Beasley et al
as 4:2018cv00648
Defendant:
Gene Beasley, Jumper, Hoyt and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzalez v. Beasley et al
as 2:2018cv00121
Defendant:
Beasley, Does, Susan Gaither-Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. Petro et al
as 2:2018cv00105
Defendant:
Does Outside Medical Care, Unknown Health Services Administrators, Clinical Directors, Directors of the BOP (2014-2018), and Unknown Medical Contract Company, Andrew Manos, B K Victor and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Marzett Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzalez v. Beasley et al
as 2:2018cv00091
Defendant:
Michael Kruger, Susan Gaither-Miller, Carlos Rivera and others
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wheelock v. Phillips et al
as 2:2018cv00087
Plaintiff:
Guy Edward Wheelock
Defendant:
Sheryl Phillips, Michelle Wingo, Kathy Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
