Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Michael Johnson v. Dexter Payne, et al
as 23-1805
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Andrew Johnson
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, William Straughn, Chief Deputy Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Benny Magness, Board of Correction, Arkansas Department of Correction and others
Michael Johnson v. Dexter Payne, et al
as 23-1433
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Andrew Johnson
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, William Straughn, Chief Deputy Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Benny Magness, Board of Correction, Arkansas Department of Correction and others
Michael Johnson v. Dexter Payne, et al
as 22-1695
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Andrew Johnson
Defendant / Appellee:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, William Straughn, Chief Deputy Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Benny Magness, Board of Correction, Arkansas Department of Correction and others
Andrews v. Johnson
as 4:2022cv00164
Plaintiff:
Adam Michael Andrews
Defendant:
Does, Brandon Johnson, Bryant Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Payne et al
as 4:2021cv00488
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Benny Magness, William Straughn and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Andrew Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Kelley et al
as 4:2020cv00806
Defendant:
Byron Brown and Wendy Kelley
Plaintiff:
Michael Andrew Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Kelley et al
as 5:2019cv00242
Plaintiff:
Michael Andrew Johnson
Defendant:
Wendy Kelley, Jada Lawerence, Paroon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClain v. Moore et al
as 5:2015cv05061
Plaintiff:
James Lee McClain
Defendant:
Tyler James Moore and Michael Andrew Caudle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
