Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Riemer v. United States Marshals Service et al
as 5:2023cv05161
Plaintiff:
Thomas Matthew Riemer
Defendant:
United States Marshals Service, Acting U.S. Marshal Mike Oglesby, Kara's Correctional Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owen Hinkson v. David Rahbany, et al
as 22-1720
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Owen Garth Hinkson
Defendant / Appellee:
David Rahbany, Chief Deputy U.S. Marshal, Eastern District of Kentucky and Daniel Gough, Deputy U.S. Marshal
Watts v. U.S. Marshals Service Western District of Missouri
as 4:2018cv00606
Defendant:
U.S. Marshals Service Western District of Missouri
Plaintiff:
Terry D. Watts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jeffery Crawford v. Nader Peikar, et al
as 14-3173
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jeffery Lamar Crawford
Defendant - Appellee:
Nader Peikar, Doctor, Federal Correctional Complex, Mary Ellen Rivers-Graham, Brenda Hoy, "AHSA" Assistance Health Service Assistance, Federal Correctional Complex and others
Maurice Sayles v. Greene County Justice Center, et al
as 12-1476
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Maurice S. Sayles
Plaintiff:
Kevin Clabough
Defendant - Appellee:
Greene County Justice Center Jail Division, Greene County Justice Center Jail Division Staff, Greene County Jail Medical Staff and others
Eric Griffin v. U.S. Marshal Service, et al
as 10-3783
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Eric Griffin
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. Marshal Service and Department of Justice
Shafer v. U.S. Marshal's Service et al
as 2:2007cv04071
Plaintiff:
David E. Shafer
Defendant:
U.S. Marshal's Service, Warren County Jail, Warren County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shafer v. U.S. Marshal's Service et al
as 2:2007cv04065
Plaintiff:
David E. Shafer
Defendant:
U.S. Marshal's Service, Callaway County Jail and Warren County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
