Cases 1 - 10 of 279
Marques Tavron v. Dexter Payne, et al
as 24-2275
Plaintiff:
Marques Tavron
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Director ADC, Moses Jackson, III, Head Warden, ADC, M. Richardson, Deputy Warden, ADC and others
Striegel v. White et al
as 6:2024cv06069
Plaintiff:
Nathan F. Striegel
Defendant:
Warden White, Major Otts and Lt. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foster v. Elias et al
as 4:2024cv00356
Plaintiff:
Lee Andrew Foster, Jr
Defendant:
Mattrew Elias, Joseph Mahoney, Maurice Culclager and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Higgins v. King et al
as 4:2024cv00340
Plaintiff:
Travon D Higgins
Defendant:
Ashley N King, Corey Haynie, JD Wheatley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tavron v. Payne et al
as 2:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Marques Tavron
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Mose Jackson, III, M Richarson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foster v. Mena et al
as 4:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Lee Andrew Foster, Jr
Defendant:
Mary Mena, Robin Collins, Sierra Brewer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Randle et al
as 4:2024cv00125
Plaintiff:
Terrence Moore
Defendant:
Kenyon Randle, Paul Harris, Etherly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
DeLarron Keith Washington
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Jimmy Coleman, IV, Janice Blake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reynolds v. Cook et al
as 2:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Reynolds
Defendant:
Pamela Cook, F D Gilbert, D J Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kent v. Payne et al
as 4:2023cv01219
Plaintiff:
Marvin Kent
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Dale Reed, Straugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
