Prisoner Petitions: Civil Detainee: Conditions of Confinement Cases filed in the Eighth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Eric Sorenson v. State of Minnesota, et al
as 24-1785
Plaintiff: Eric Michael Sorenson, also known as Cherrity Honesty-Alexis Meranelli
Defendant: State of Minnesota, All Defendants are currently sued in their individual and official capacities; All Defendants have and continue to act under the Color of State Law, Minnesota Department of Human Services, (DHS) All Defendants are currently sued in their individual and official capacities; All Defendants have and continue to act under the Color of State Law, Minnesota Sex Offender Program, (MSOP) All Defendants are currently sued in their individual and official capacities; All Defendants have and continue to act under the Color of State Law and others
Grande v. State of MN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2024cv00028
Plaintiff: Patrick Ryan Grande
Defendant: State of MN, Saint Peter Regional Treatment Center and State of MN Dept. of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hodson v. United States of America, The
as 0:2023cv03569
Plaintiff: David Joseph Hodson
Defendant: The United States of America and United States of America, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meranelli v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2023cv00848
Plaintiff: Cherrity Honesty-Alexis Meranelli and Eric M. Sorenson
Defendant: Minnesota Department of Human Services, Minnesota Sex Offender Program, State Operated Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kelly v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2022cv00772
Plaintiff: Michael Steven Kelly
Defendant: State of Missouri and Judge William J Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Meranelli v. State of Minnesota et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2022cv00946
Plaintiff: Cherrity Honesty-Alexis Meranelli and Eric Sorenson
Defendant: State of Minnesota, Minnesota Department of Human Services, Minnesota Sex Offender Program and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Eric Sorenson v. State of Minnesota, et al
as 22-1057
Plaintiff / Appellant: Eric Michael Sorenson, also known as Cherrity Honesty-Alexis Meranelli
Defendant / Appellee: State of Minnesota, All Defendants are currently sued in their individual and official capacities; All Defendants have and continue to act under the Color of State Law, Minnesota Department of Human Services, (DHS) All Defendants are currently sued in their individual and official capacities; All Defendants have and continue to act under the Color of State Law, Minnesota Sex Offender Program, (MSOP) All Defendants are currently sued in their individual and official capacities; All Defendants have and continue to act under the Color of State Law and others
Joseph Favors v. Jodi Harpstead, et al
as 22-1018
Plaintiff / Appellant: Joseph Anthony Favors
Defendant / Appellee: Jodi Harpstead, Individual/Official Capacities and as Commissioner of DHS/MSOP; And their successors in interest, Nancy Johnston, Individual/Official Capacities and as Executive Director of MSOP; And their successors in interest, Bryan Lake, Individual/Official Capacities and as SRB Chair Person; And their successors in interest and others
Prouty v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2021cv02437
Plaintiff: Darrell Dean Prouty
Defendant: State of Minnesota, All current DHS-MSOP employees, Jodi Harpstead and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Donnell v. St. Louis County District Court et al
as 0:2021cv02253
Plaintiff: Mikey J. O'Donnell
Defendant: St. Louis County District Court, Erok Skon, State of Minnesota and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?