Cases 21 - 30 of 1,349
Fenley v. Quapaw Baths, LLC
as 6:2023cv06138
Plaintiff:
Cinthia Fenley
Defendant:
Quapaw Baths, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Oliver et al v. Southwest Homes of Arkansas, Inc.
as 5:2023cv05205
Plaintiff:
William Oliver and Casey Oliver
Defendant:
Southwest Homes of Arkansas, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant:
Oliver Builders, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Cleveland v. First US Clinic PA et al
as 4:2023cv01066
Plaintiff:
William Cleveland
Defendant:
First US Clinic PA and Olabode Olumofin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Cifuentes et al v. Outcomes, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv05197
Plaintiff:
Kaylee Cifuentes and Amber Carl
Defendant:
Outcomes, Inc. and Tony Posey
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jones v. Mississippi Limestone Corporation
as 2:2023cv00218
Plaintiff:
Bobby L Jones
Defendant:
Mississippi Limestone Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Wise et al v. Ambulance Services of Forrest City LLC
as 2:2023cv00213
Plaintiff:
Neil Wise and Jill Wise
Defendant:
Ambulance Services of Forrest City LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Hurst v. DMC LLC
as 3:2023cv00195
Plaintiff:
Aaron Hurst
Defendant:
DMC LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Morgan et al v. Ochi et al
as 4:2023cv00786
Plaintiff:
Christine Morgan and D'Andre King
Defendant:
Chukwu Emeka Ochi and King Aces Chicken & Fish LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Flores v. San Angel 2 of Arkansas Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00175
Plaintiff:
Graciela Fernandez Flores
Defendant:
San Angel 2 of Arkansas Inc and Franciso Javier Romo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Johnson v. Tasty Chick'n LLC
as 3:2023cv00167
Plaintiff:
Brandy Johnson
Defendant:
Tasty Chick'n LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
