Cases 91 - 100 of 13,715
Russom v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 6:2024cv06036
Plaintiff:
Trinity Russom
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Hiner v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
Angela M. Hiner
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Deutsch v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv00961
Plaintiff:
Gary Deutsch
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Johnson v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
Demetric Johnson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Groce v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv00947
Plaintiff:
Gavin Groce
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Whitehead v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv00945
Plaintiff:
Andrew Keith Whitehead
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Bishop v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00243
Plaintiff:
Regena Bishop
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rippeto-Bruner v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 6:2024cv06028
Plaintiff:
Annette Rippeto-Bruner
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Boyd v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00382
Plaintiff:
Terence Boyd
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Clark v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Matthew L. Clark
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
