Cases 131 - 140 of 31,154
Homan v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 2:2024cv02041
Plaintiff:
Stacey Lee Homan
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Smith v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00275
Plaintiff:
Latasha Monae Smith
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Gartner v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Carrie Gartner
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Johnson v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv04042
Plaintiff:
Donald B. Johnson
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Scott v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
Ruby Scott
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Scranton v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 5:2024cv05072
Plaintiff:
Kevin Neil Scranton
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Johnson v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv01059
Plaintiff:
Ryan Johnson
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Joshua v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00215
Plaintiff:
Joshua Peter Gonzales
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Boyd v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00445
Plaintiff:
William Boyd
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Dudley v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00446
Plaintiff:
Patrick Dudley
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
