Cases 141 - 150 of 31,154
Meyers v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 2:2024cv02037
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey A. Meyers
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 g Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Trotter v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Brian Earl Trotter
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Clarke v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
Kaitlyn Rodee Clarke
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Merrill v. O'Malley
as 6:2024cv03079
Plaintiff:
Jack Anthony Merrill
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Russom v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 6:2024cv06036
Plaintiff:
Trinity Russom
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Walker v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Shanreckia Lanell Walker
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Burch v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00435
Plaintiff:
Jill Burch
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Didovic v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00436
Plaintiff:
Semsa Didovic
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Hiner v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
Angela M. Hiner
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Breczinski v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv01001
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Breczinski
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
