Cases 161 - 170 of 31,158
Watts v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Ann Watts
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Owens v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 6:2024cv06029
Plaintiff:
Letia Owens
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 g Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Groce v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv00947
Plaintiff:
Gavin Groce
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Gibbons v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00405
Plaintiff:
Ryan Gibbons
Defendant:
Martin O`Malley and Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Gibbons v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Ryan Gibbons
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Whitehead v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv00945
Plaintiff:
Andrew Keith Whitehead
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Dees v. Kijakazi
as 6:2024cv03075
Plaintiff:
Danny Joe Dees
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Peck v. O'Malley
as 6:2024cv03074
Plaintiff:
Louise Ann Peck
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bishop v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00243
Plaintiff:
Regena Bishop
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rippeto-Bruner v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 6:2024cv06028
Plaintiff:
Annette Rippeto-Bruner
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
