Cases 1 - 10 of 79
Davis v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 8:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Michael Davis, Sr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Johnson v. Kijakazi et al
as 0:2023cv00886
Plaintiff:
Torrence L Johnson, Sr.
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Boozer v. Kijakazi
as 4:2022cv01347
Plaintiff:
Everett N. Boozer, Sr.
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Honaker, Sr v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2022cv02045
Plaintiff:
Steven Honaker and Steven Honaker, Sr
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
French, Sr. v. Kijakazi
as 4:2022cv01031
Plaintiff:
Matthew S. French, Sr.
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Fendler v. Saul
as 4:2021cv00614
Plaintiff:
Paul J. Fendler, Sr.
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul and Andrew Saul
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Preston v. Saul
as 4:2020cv00773
Plaintiff:
Carl William Preston, Sr
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Shunkwiler v. Saul
as 1:2020cv00145
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Stephen Keith Shunkwiler, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lake v. Saul
as 4:2020cv00205
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Vance V. Lake, Sr.
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Kirby v. Saul
as 4:2020cv00177
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Esten T. Kirby, Sr
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
