Cases 111 - 120 of 2,683
Cleo Watkins, et al v. Lawrence County, Arkansas, et al
as 23-1939
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Cleo Watkins, Pyles Family Farms LLC, Victor Hutcheson, originally named as Victor Hutcherson and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Lawrence County, Arkansas, John Thomison, in his official capacity as County Judge of Lawrence County Arkansas, William Powell, In his official capacity as a member of the Lawrence County Quorum Court and others
United States v. John Jones
as 23-2405
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
John Jerrod Jones
Prosser v. Glo Tanning Centers, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv00768
Plaintiff:
Christopher Prosser
Defendant:
Glo Tanning Centers, Inc. and John and Jane Does 1 through 3
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
John McConnell v. DST Systems, Inc.
as 23-1733
Plaintiff / Appellee:
John McConnell
Defendant / Appellant:
DST Systems, Inc.
John Shultz v. DST Systems, Inc.
as 23-1745
Plaintiff / Appellee:
John Shultz
Defendant / Appellant:
DST Systems, Inc.
Cookie Dough Bliss Franchising, LLC v. Feed Your Soul Minnesota, LLC et al
as 0:2023cv01552
Plaintiff:
Cookie Dough Bliss Franchising, LLC
Defendant:
Feed Your Soul Minnesota, LLC, Gina Ehrisman and John Ehrisman
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00284
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Douglas Brust, et al v. Opensided MRI of St. Louis, LLC, et al
as 23-8003
Respondent:
Douglas Phillip Brust, D.C., P.C. and Alan Presswood, D.C., P.C., individually and on behalf of all others similarly-situated
Petitioner:
Opensided MRI of St. Louis, LLC, Opensided MRI of St. Louis II, LLC and Matthew Ruyle
Not Classified By Court:
Paul Eugene Schwetz and John Does 1-10
United States v. John Mitchelson
as 23-2141
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
John Andrew Mitchelson
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
