Cases 21 - 30 of 64
United States v. Seneca Harrison
as 19-2234
Defendant / Appellant:
Seneca Harrison
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Walmart, Inc. et al v. Pilgrim's Pride Corporation, et al
as 5:2019cv05100
Defendant:
Harrison Poultry, Inc., Agri Stats, Inc., Sanderson Farms, Inc. (Food Division) and others
Plaintiff:
Wal-Mart Stores, East, LP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
United States v. Jay Carder
as 19-1638
Defendant / Appellant:
Jay Harrison Lee Carder
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00639
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Ross et al v. Buckles et al
as 8:2017mc00089
Defendant:
Scott A. Buckles, Clarke Realty, LLC, Dan Elliott, Inc. and others
Creditor:
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors
Plaintiff:
Ron Ross
Debtor:
Skyline Manor, Inc.
Interested Party:
U.S. Bankruptcy Court
Ross et al v. Buckles et al
as 8:2017mc00062
Defendant:
Scott A. Buckles, Clarke Realty, LLC, Dan Elliott, Inc. and others
Creditor:
Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors
Plaintiff:
Ron Ross
Debtor:
Skyline Manor, Inc.
Interested Party:
U.S. Bankruptcy Court
Ross v. Skyline Manor, Inc. et al
as 8:2017mc00038
Defendant:
Scott A. Buckles, Clarke Realty, LLC, Dan Elliott, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ron Ross
Debtor:
Skyline Manor, Inc.
Interested Party:
U.S. Bankruptcy Court
Phil Rosemann, et al v. St. Louis Bank
as 15-3965
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Phil Rosemann, Judith Smith, Suzanne Glisson and others
Defendant - Appellee:
St. Louis Bank
United States v. Christopher Headbird
as 15-3718
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Christopher Harrison Headbird
Richard Aguilar, et al v. PNC Bank, N.A.
as 15-3514
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Richard Aguilar, Melba Aguilar, Albert Carrell and others
Defendant - Appellee:
PNC Bank, N.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
