Cases 81 - 90 of 93
Richardson v. USADO NOT DOCKET. ALL DOCKETING OCCURS IN THE CRIMINAL CASE.
as 0:2009cv03213
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Carl Lee Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2009cv03071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Type:
Other Statutes
United States v. Coby Levan Richardson
as 09-3135
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Coby Levan Richardson
Mike Buetow, et al v. A.L.S. Enterprises, Inc., et al
as 09-8013
Petitioner:
Mike Buetow, Gary Steven Richardson, Jr., Joe Rohrbach and others
Respondent:
A.L.S. Enterprises, Inc., Cabela's Inc., Cabela's Wholesale, Inc. and others
Arrington v. Richardson et al
as 5:2009cv04049
Plaintiff:
Angela Arrington
Defendant:
Nancy J Richardson, Mark Lowe and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States v. Dorian Richardson
as 09-1894
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Dorian W. Richardson
Hardy et al v. Malvern School District et al
as 6:2008cv06094
Plaintiff:
Darrin Hardy, Julie Hardy, Benjamin Lynch, Sr. and others
Defendant:
Malvern School District, Brian Golden, Deborah - Smith and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
United States v. Kenneth Richardson
as 08-3038
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Kenneth Lee Richardson
United States v. Ontario Rush-Richardson
as 08-2414
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Ontario Rush-Richardson
Richardson v. The Ultimate Warranty Corporation et al
as 4:2008mc00270
Plaintiff:
Scott H. Richardson
Defendant:
Ultimate Warranty of Wisconsin, Inc., The Ultimate Warranty Corporation, Ultimate Warranty of Ohio, Inc. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
