Cases 1 - 10 of 16
United States v. Dayton Wiggins, Jr.
as 23-3433
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Dayton Lee Wiggins, Jr.
Shavelle Chavez-Nelson v. Gov. Mark Dayton, et al
as 21-3173
Petitioner / Appellant:
Shavelle Oscar Chavez-Nelson
Respondent / Appellee:
Governor Mark Dayton and Tom Roy, Commissioner of Corrections
Linda Hoekman, et al v. Education Minnesota, et al
as 21-2675
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Linda Hoekman, Mary Dee Buros and Paul Hanson, all appellants on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated
Plaintiff:
Deborah York, Aaron Benner, Carolyn Workman and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Education Minnesota, as representative of the class of all chapters and affiliates of Education Minnesota, Anoka Hennepin Education Minnesota, as representative of the class of all chapters and affiliates of Education Minnesota, National Education Association and others
Defendant:
Anoka Hennepin School District, as representative of the class of all school districts in Minnesota, Mark Dayton, in his official capacity as governor of Minnesota, Lori Swanson, in her official capacity as Attorney General of Minnesota and others
Linda Hoekman, et al v. Education Minnesota, et al
as 21-1366
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Paul Hanson, all appellants on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Linda Hoekman and Mary Dee Buros
Defendant:
Anoka Hennepin School District, as representative of the class of all school districts in Minnesota, Mark Dayton, in his official capacity as governor of Minnesota, Lori Swanson, in her official capacity as Attorney General of Minnesota and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Education Minnesota, as representative of the class of all chapters and affiliates of Education Minnesota, Anoka Hennepin Education Minnesota, as representative of the class of all chapters and affiliates of Education Minnesota, American Federation of Teachers and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Benner, Debra J. Aune, Deborah York and others
Appellant:
Freedom Foundation and Joseph Johnson
Manetirony Clervrain v. Mark Dayton, et al
as 21-1189
Defendant / Appellee:
John Sandweg, Director (ICE), Mark Dayton, Governor, Lori Swanson, Attorney General of Minnesota and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Manetirony Clervrain
Tony Jackson v. Tim Walz, et al
as 20-1805
Defendant / Appellee:
Cari Gerlicher, former Office of Special Investigations Director of the MNDOC, in her individual & official capacity, Sheila Packwood, Corrections Program Director, R.D.N.L.D, Food & Nutrition Services, in her Official capacity, Union Local 600 AFSCME, Individually & Official Capacity as Corrections Guard Unit, Representatives Stillwater Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tony D. Jackson, Jail House Lawyer, Other Similarly Situated Prisoners At Stillwater Correctional Facility & Other Similarly Situated Prisoners At Rush City Correctional Facility & All Other Minnesota Correctional Facilities & Contracted Half Way Hou
Joseph Hirchak, et al v. W.W. Grainger, et al
as 19-2642
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joseph Hirchak and Cindy Hirchak
Defendant / Appellee:
Dayton Electric and W.W. Grainger, Inc., doing business as Grainger, doing business as Dayton
Defendant:
McMaster-Carr
Kemen Taylor, II v. Mark Dayton, et al
as 19-2064
Respondent / Appellee:
Governor Mark Dayton and Tom Roy, Commissioner of Corrections
Petitioner / Appellant:
Kemen Lavatos Taylor, II
Hoekman et al v. Education Minnesota et al
as 0:2018cv01686
Plaintiff:
Linda Hoekman and Deborah York
Defendant:
Education Minnesota , Anoka Hennepin Education Minnesota , National Education Association and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hout v. Montana State Department of Child and Family Services et al
as 1:2017cv00084
Plaintiff:
Safron Huot
Defendant:
Montana State Department of Child and Family Services, Montana Supreme Court, Deer Lodge County District Court of Montana and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
