Cases 1 - 8 of 8
United States v. Sarah Goforth
as 23-1341
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Sarah Chezahrae Goforth, also known as Sarah Hedrick, also known as Darah Bachelor
Toby Lacy v. Unknown Callahan, et al
as 21-2481
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Toby Edwards Lacy
Defendant / Appellee:
Unknown Callahan, Officer SGT., Timothy Hedricks, Parole Officer, Lisa Dempsey, Unit Supervisor and others
Little Rock Downtown Nbrhd, et al v. FHA, et al
as 20-2910
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dale Pekar, Forest Hills Neighborhood Association Inc., Little Rock Downtown Neighborhood Association Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Arkansas Department of Transportation, Lorie Tudor, Director, Arkansas Department of Transportation (originally named as Scott Bennett), Federal Highway Administration and others
Margulis v. Superior Travel Services, LLC
as 4:2019cv03225
Defendant:
John Does 1-10, Superior Travel Services, LLC and Brent Hedrick
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Margulis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Little Rock Downtown Neighborhood Association Inc et al v. Federal Highway Administration et al
as 4:2019cv00362
Plaintiff:
Denise Ennett, Pettaway Neighborhood Association, Barbara Barrows and others
Defendant:
Department of Transportation, Arkansas Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Arkansas Division and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Wade Elliot Bowles v. Robert Dooley, et al
as 15-1723
Petitioner:
Wade Elliot Bowles
Respondent:
Robert Dooley, Warden, Lara Roetzel, Pennington County Prosecutor, Janine M. Kern, Pennington County Judge and others
Westine v. Hedrick
as 6:2004cv03261
Petitioner:
John G. Westine
Respondent:
Bill Hedrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Hedrick
as 3:2007mc09001
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Darrell W. Hedrick
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6330 Review of IRS Due Process Hearing
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
