Cases 1 - 10 of 10
United States v. Kevin Kerr
as 22-1694
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Kevin Kerr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv02676
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Kelly Strantz, et al v. Johnson & Johnson, et al
as 13-8040
Plaintiff - Respondent:
Kelly Strantz, Susan Coletta, Suzanne Prael and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
Johnson & Johnson, Inc., Ethicon, Inc. and Ethicon, LLC
United States v. Kevin Kerr
as 10-1575
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Kevin Kerr
Hasel, et al v. Kerr Corporation
as 0:1999cv01376
Plaintiff:
Robert W Hasel and ABCO Research LLC
Defendant:
Kerr Corporation
Counter_claimant:
Kerr Corporation
Counter_defendant:
Robert W Hasel and ABCO Research LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
United States of America v. Kerr
as 6:2009cv03438
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Kevin Kerr
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4245 Petition to Determine Mental Status of Prisoner
Kerr v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 0:2009cv03267
Plaintiff:
Sandra Kerr, Sandra Kerr, Sandra Kerr and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic International Technology, Inc. and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Type:
Other Statutes
National Shopmen Pension Fund et al v. Columbia Iron Works, Inc.
as 4:2009mc00513
Plaintiff:
National Shopmen Pension Fund, John kerr, Anthony Walencik and others
Defendant:
Columbia Iron Works, Inc.
Billy Kerr v. Larry Norris
as 09-1042
Petitioner:
Billy Steve Kerr
Respondent:
Larry Norris, Director Arkansas Department of Correction
United States of America v. Pepe-Kerr
as 2:2008mc09003
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Celeste Pepe-Kerr
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
