Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Prosser v. Dream Nissan Midwest, LLC
as 4:2024cv00798
Plaintiff:
Christopher Prosser
Defendant:
Dream Nissan Midwest, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Human v. Dennis Dillon Automotive Group, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00309
Plaintiff:
Daniel Human
Defendant:
Dennis Dillon Automotive Group, Inc. doing business as Dennis Dillon Nissan and John and Jane Does 1 through 14
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Anich v. Wood Motor Nissan Lee's Summit LLC
as 4:2022cv00582
Plaintiff:
Elyester Anich
Defendant:
Wood Motor Nissan Lee's Summit LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 21-2440
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Laura Hays v. Nissan North America
as 21-8004
Petitioner:
Nissan North America, Inc.
Respondent:
Laura Frances Hays, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Not Classified By Court:
Nissan Motor Co., Ltd.
Austin Lightfeather v. City of Lincoln
as 21-1646
Defendant:
Trevor, Dawn, Malinda, Mental Health Board of Douglas, NE, Pierce Bower and others
Defendant / Appellee:
City of Lincoln
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Austin Edward Lightfeather
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv05098
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00888
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00173
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2019cv00727
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
