Cases 121 - 130 of 375
Jilk v. Monsanto Company et al
as 4:2019cv02443
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Jilk
Defendant:
John Does 1 through 100 inclusive and Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jordan v. John Autrey Trucking, Inc. et al
as 5:2019cv05136
Defendant:
Tate Zimmerman, Taz, LLC, John Autrey Trucking, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Dean Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Campbell v. Lake Regional Medical Management, Inc. d/b/a Lake Regional Medical Urgent Care - Eldon et al
as 2:2019cv04124
Defendant:
Kandi Williams, Michael J Vierra, Kandi Padgett and others
Plaintiff:
Michelle Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marter v. Potlatchdeltic Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv01029
Defendant:
Potlatchdeltic Corporation and John Does 1-3
Plaintiff:
Bruce Marter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Casey v. New Prime, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02058
Plaintiff:
Lorie Casey
Defendant:
Phillips Knight, Jr., New Prime, Inc. and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Munkres v. Monsanto Company et al
as 4:2019cv01174
Defendant:
John Does 1-50 and Monsanto Company
Plaintiff:
Terrill J. Munkres
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Monsanto Company
as 4:2019cv01175
Plaintiff:
Irene M. Smith and David B. Smith
Defendant:
John Does 1-50 and Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pearlson v. Monsanto Company et al
as 4:2019cv00899
Plaintiff:
David Pearlson
Defendant:
John Does 1-50 and Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hutton v. Dollar General Corporation et al
as 5:2019cv05086
Defendant:
John Does 1-5, Dollar General Corporation and Dollar General Corporation doing business as Dollar General No. 13293
Plaintiff:
Jim L. Hutton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gebel et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv00820
Plaintiff:
Alice Pollman, Joyce Cox, Vanessa Brown and others
Defendant:
John Does 1-20, Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Ethicon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
