Cases 1 - 10 of 139
Murphy v. AT&T, Inc. et al
as 0:2024cv02050
Plaintiff:
Paul Murphy
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc. and AT&T Mobility LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Piens v. Reckard et al
as 4:2024cv04086
Plaintiff:
Thola Dean Piens
Defendant:
Dr. Justin Reckard, Dr. Syed F. Azam, Dr. Scott A. Gering and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Spencer v. Murphy et al
as 6:2023cv03340
Plaintiff:
Donald Spencer
Defendant:
Avageleca Dayshonn Murphy, Greyhound Lines, Inc. and Missouri Highways and Transportation Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Thomas v. Murphy, et al
as 6:2023cv03341
Defendant:
Tyrone Thomas, Avageleca Dayshonn Murphy, Greyhound Lines, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Murphy v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv03379
Plaintiff:
Tina Murphy
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Ackerman et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv02686
Plaintiff:
Alexander Ackerman, Jorge Ibrain Adrian, Jose Dimas Alfaro and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Alexander et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv02616
Plaintiff:
Melissa Alexander, Michael Wayne Allen, Alan Alsop and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Abelon et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv02589
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Hawkins, Jeffrey Herrington, Renita Jackson and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Howard et al v. Murphy et al
as 1:2023cv00059
Plaintiff:
Evelyn Howard, Michael Howard and Suellyn Parson
Defendant:
Charles Murphy and TraLo Enterprises, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Goodman et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv01380
Plaintiff:
Timothy Goodman, Brandon Koenig-Messer, Ryan Loibl and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
